What is Metachemics?

     Metachemics is a new field that integrates science and philosophy.  This study's goal is to discover and express the truth about The Universe's fundamental nature.  It is not enough to limit Metachemics to divided fields such as: Astronomy, Physics, Chemistry, Geology, or Biology.  I seek absolute, fundamental principles that are true across them all.

Metachemics is guided by Ayn Rand's philosophy--known as Objectivism.  With so many false and corrupted philosophies out there, Objectivism is the only one I trust.  I have studied this philosophy extensively--having read 156 books recommended by the mainstream Objectivist catalogs {by 3/13/23}.

Metachemics is an inductive science.  I believe that universal truth can be discovered by integrating rational thought premises with further, logical, rational thought.  When done correctly, my philosophy has an advantage that typical science often lacks.  To give an example, consider the question, "If a tree falls on an Earth-like planet, orbiting near The Universe's opposite side, does it make a sound?"  Some observation-shackled "scientists" may claim that it does not because it is impossible to measure the sound there with observations.  I argue that: that Universal part still exists, Earth-like planets there are bound by the same scientific laws as here, and that the tree that fell did cause sound.

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

Energy = LightSpeed of LightSpeed of LightQuantity

[P1] Energy = (Mass)(Distance Change)(Distance Change) per (Time Change)(Time Change)

[P2] Energy = (Mass)(LightSpeed)(LightSpeed)

[P3] LightEnergy = (LightMass)(LightSpeed)(LightSpeed)

[P1] = [P2]

[P2] (LightSpeed)(LightSpeed) = (Energy) per (Mass)

[P3] (LightSpeed)(LightSpeed) = (LightEnergy) per (LightMass)

[P2] = [P3]

If [P1] = [P2], and, [P2] = [P3], then [P1] = [P3]

Mass = LightMass

Mass = Matter Quantity

All Matter is Light

Mass = LightQuantity

E = mc^2

Energy = cc(LightQuantity)

Energy equals LightSpeed of LightSpeed of LightQuantity

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

The Universe

Matter is Something
Place is where Something is
Space is where Something could be
The Universe is all Matter and Space

Matter is Light

Something is Light
Place is where Light is
Space is where Light could be
The Universe is all Light and Space

The Universe is all Light and where Light could be

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

Density

Density = Place per Space

Place is where Light is
Space is where Light could be

Density = where Light is per where Light could be

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

Dynamic Fundamentals

Mass = matter quantity
Time Change = the synchronized universal events progression
Distance Change = the linear, absolute value difference between where one point was and where it is

point is one light's gravitational center
Gravity is the constant, universal attractive force between all matter that is a metaphysical axiom

Mass value is a natural number
Time Change value is a positive number
Distance Change value is a conceptual number

Conceptual Numbers are those numbers between zero and the positive, distance diameter of The Universe

Mass = (M)
Time Change = (TC)
Distance Change = (DC)

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

Whartonian Dynamics

Velocity = (1)(DC) / (TC)
Acceleration = (1)(DC) / (TC)(TC)

Momentum = (M)(DC) / (TC)
Force = (M)(DC) / (TC)(TC)
Energy = (M)(DC)(DC) / (TC)(TC)
Power = (M)(DC)(DC) / (TC)(TC)(TC)

Reign = (M)(DC)(DC) / (TC)(TC)(TC)(TC)
Drive = (M)(DC)(DC)(DC) / (TC)(TC)(TC)(TC)
Thrust = (M)(DC)(DC)(DC) / (TC)(TC)(TC)(TC)(TC)
Surge = (M)(DC)(DC)(DC) / (TC)(TC)(TC)(TC)(TC)(TC)

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

Notation to Concept Conversions and the Reverse

Line = (DC)
Area = (DC)(DC)
Volume = (DC)(DC)(DC)

Pressure = (M) / (DC)(TC)(TC)
Energy = Everything with notation: (kg)(m)(m) / (sec)(sec)
Energy = Pressure of Volume

Sound = Pressure of Volume
Sound is Energy

Field = (M)(DC)(DC)(DC) / (TC)(TC)
Energy = Field per Line

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

All Force is Gravity

     I was trying to discover what fundamental forces exist in The Universe, years ago; so I called up my brother who holds a Ph.D. in laser physics.  He claimed that there are four fundamental forces:

(1) Gravity
(2) Electromagnetic Force
(3) Strong Nuclear Force
(4) Weak Nuclear Force

In order for something to have force upon other something or somethings, it must have mass.  As I have explained earlier, all matter is light.  Therefore, it is only light that has force properties.  Newton's Gravitational Theory stands as proven in science; so I don't question that.  The other three "fundamental forces", however, I do.

Having had to wade through some really messed up "science" in formulating my Metachemics, I thought that there could easily be errors in my brother's fundamental force tally.  The following is my reasoning:

If Electromagnetic Force exists, what is its range?  Does a one light unit exert Electromagnetic Force against every other one light unit even if it is on a Universal edge, as Gravity does?

Concerning a close range analysis, imagine two independent, one light particles.  They gravitate together to form a solid that modern physics claims produces a new fundamental force.  Then, another multi-light solid strikes the two light solid--breaking the two light particles apart.  Does the newly gained fundamental force disappear?  Is it negated in reality?  If the two light particles come together again, do they get the "fundamental" force back?

My guess in regard to the final two "fundamental forces" (Strong Nuclear and Weak Nuclear) is that they have been invented by modern physicists so that their flawed "science" supporters have a way to try to explain their data.  The misguided "scientist" can say: "There's a lot of force there (Strong Nuclear).  But, when the micro-forces (Weak Nuclear) are accounted for, the data comes out right."

My conclusion is the hypothesis:

All Force is Gravity

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

Everything's Mechanical

     The Universe is all Matter and Space.  While Mass is a natural number, there is a limit that exists.  The light units' number in The Universe is the highest natural number in existence.

Space (defined as where light could be) also is limited.  Since Gravity (the constant, universal attractive force between all matter that is a metaphysical axiom) pulls all matter towards all other matter, it acts as a retainment force.  This concept can be summarized as:

Gravity Limits The Universe

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

There's no loophole for evil

     As I explained in a previously published post, "All Force is Gravity", every force in The Universe is caused by, and propelled by, Gravity.  This could lead to some dangerous conclusions.

First, it may be supposed that a human does not have free will.  While it may be technically true that one does not, evolution has designed Man with self-propelling capabilities and a specific nature.  Another fact is that each individual is so complex that it is absolutely impossible for any other individual to be able to completely predict and/or control another.

Second, it would be a grave mistake to adopt a philosophy that dismisses every crime or flaw with the explanation: "Gravity did it."  To illustrate this, imagine a pet Grizzly Bear that discovers that it can gain food by eating human beings.  As it gets more and more experience at hunting and killing Man, there reaches a situation in which it becomes necessary to put it down--whether Gravity is propelling it, or not.

Another Metachemical point I have not yet made is the fact that everything with Mass is physical.  What I have seen too much in my past is messed up minds committing outrageous injustice with the warped belief that certain things are not physical when they are.

For example, suppose that a mental hospital nurse is told by superiors to poke just a tiny needle into someone that will push a chemical substance into him for only one second.  Did this person initiate physical force?  Is chemistry a science that studies matter?  Is a chemical physical?  Will the substance be any significance at all, as the victim's bloodstream transports it to his brain?

The point I am trying to make is that despite Metachemics's novelty, and the new way to conceive The Universe, one may want to integrate one's actions with common sense because as this post's name says: "There's no loophole for evil."

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

Intellectual Credit to Those Who Helped Lead to Metachemics

(1) David Harriman
(2) Leonard Peikoff
(3) Ayn Rand
(4) Harry Binswanger
(5) Aristotle
(6) Microsoft's Encarta
(7) Yaron Brook
(8) Ludwig von Mises
(9) Oxford English Dictionary
(10) G.E.R. Lloyd
(11) Robert Mayhew
(12) Robert E. Knapp
(13) Keith Lockitch
(14) Travis Norsen
(15) Pat Corvini

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics