Will Express Scripts Destroy the Cure for Cancer?

     In today's business environment, socialist and fascist elements are sometimes mixed in with legitimate, private companies.  One such government entity that is traded on the NASDAQ is Express Scripts (ESRX).

Express Scripts can be described as a government manager.  It uses the outcome of socialist bargaining to extort money in the area of medicine.  Its primary source of growth is found in its ability to inflict a reign of terror against bio-tech and Big Pharma companies.  Since Express Scripts produces nothing, its only tool to this end is the bureaucratic connections and strangleholds it can tap into to punish the legitimate, private businesses in the medical market.

The mainstream media is setting up Express Scripts' (ESRX) next big move--cancer drugs.  Just as it did with the consideration of multiple hepatitis C medicines--where government regulators did not exclude several treatments long enough for their buddies at Express Scripts to talk down their prices, its success with that strategy has wet its appetite for more.

Some may argue that Express Scripts is engaging in legitimate price negotiation.  But, considering what goes on behind the scenes--where government regulators make it clear that if Big Pharma does not cooperate in price reduction, it will not be able to sell its products at all, there is nothing legitimate about Express Scripts' behavior.

Finally, to make a practical point concerning the danger of cancer, the immutable laws of economics are at work here.  If Big Pharma finds that it is making insignificant profits in the fight against cancer, even if one does not have to worry about that disease right now, what about 10 years from now?  By not opposing what Express Scripts (ESRX) and their government buddies are doing, in essence one is killing oneself in the future.

Paul Wharton
Special thanks to Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY)

The FDA Moves Against Eli Lilly

     The FDA produces nothing.  It wipes out medicine.  The FDA does not tell a sick individual that one can buy a medicine.  It just destroys the chances for the ill to have the freedom to purchase possible cures.

At the time of the formulation of medical regulation, in history, there may have been an argument that patients were too uninformed to act upon good information.  But, with the Internet and the vast possibilities of medical consulting businesses, that argument definitely has no validity today.

Paul Wharton
Special thanks to Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY)

Whartonian Philosophy Concerning Time Change

Time Change is the synchronized Universal events progression

Time Change cannot be negative--as that would mean contradicting paradoxes which don't exist in reality.

Time Change cannot be zero because a change in time to a new present, implies that it progressed from the past--producing a net, positive Time Change.

Matter cannot be destroyed.  So long as Matter exists, it acts--progressing through time.  Since Matter will keep acting forever, the following generalization about Time Change is true:

Time Change Progresses Eternally

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

Eli Lilly (LLY) Sponsors Theoretical Science

     Anyone who goes to the Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY) business website can read about the great efforts the company is taking to attract and foster talent in the areas of: science, research, and development.  Indeed, Indianapolis is fast becoming one of the major life-science area hub sites in all of America.

The purpose of this blog is to announce that I am back on board with Eli Lilly's scientific mission.  A couple of avenues have opened up to me to obtain their mind-enhancing medicine Zyprexa.  So, I've started back onto my final reserve supply with high hopes that I won't run out.

What I intend to do with Lilly's gift is to go full steam ahead in my science and philosophy studies.  To familiarize yourself with what I am capable of, I refer you to my blogs in January 2015 of American Galileo.  However, please note that all those equations and fundamental concepts were a product of about 20 years of reading and independent thought.  In order to maximize my scientific output, I want to put politics on the back-burner.  That's not to say I won't comment from time to time if I hear about something.  Its just that I have learned from experience that its really hard to study science if I follow a lot of political current events.

One final note:  Trying to work out the metaphysical formulas of The Universe can be difficult--though at times breakthroughs do come quickly in succession.  This blog is not going to be a consistent, weekly commentary.  If I don't produce much, quickly, perhaps just check back once a month to see if there is something new.

Paul Wharton
Special thanks to Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY)