How Ted Cruz should save America

     Of all the politicians running for President, Senator Ted Cruz is my favorite.  However, I do not support his campaign--the reason being that he could accomplish so much more by publicly dropping out in a way that refutes Obama.

What is better: to steer America back somewhat towards the direction of progress from the disastrous state the country is in today, or, to wipe out everything Obama thinks he did during his supposed "Presidency"?

It is my interpretation that a law must be understood in order for it to be followed.  And, if a law does not mean what it says, then there is a real immoral problem there.  But, in fact, when it comes to the highest law of the land, The Constitution of the United States of America, it means what it says because of the law of identity.  A is A

In Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution, it is written:

"No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."

Since Ted Cruz was born in Canada, this part of the Constitution contradicts his entire presidential run.  He basically has two options: continue to evade the arguments that The Constitution means what it says, or, choose to drop out on the grounds that a non-natural born citizen cannot become President.

Look at what choosing the latter would do.  If Ted Cruz (who desperately wants to lead this country) can't be President, then Barack Obama (who was born in Kenya) can't be, either--and in fact never was.

I know Ted Cruz may be upset by my arguments in this blog.  But, is more political power so luring, as to propel one to dispense with one's conscience concerning the greatness of America's Constitution?  Is it so belittling to realize one's highest career achievement as the attainment of a seat in the United States Senate?  Ted Cruz is a great man.  Now, what can he do to make America its greatest?

Paul Wharton
Special thanks to Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY)

The Constitution overrules the Supreme Court

     America falls under the category of the greatest type of government possible--a Constitutionally Limited Republic.  While the Supreme Court does judge the laws of Congress with The Constitution as its standard, it cannot violate the law of identity and reason in its rulings.  Yesterday, it attempted to do just that.

Instead of focusing this blog on the travesty of Chief Justice Roberts' contradictions, I want to explore a different angle.  Since The Constitution of the United States of America is the highest law of the land--not the whims of the top judges--it is The Constitution that Americans should look to to understand current law.  In Article II, Section 1, it says:

"No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."

Applying logic and reason, this clause of our Constitutionally Limited Republic means that:

(1) Barack Obama never was President.

(2) Sotomayor and Kagen never were appointed to the Supreme Court by the President.

(3) The 6-3 Obamacare decision (that tried to desecrate The Constitution, by the way) was actually 4-3-2 (meaning that two judgeship seats that are currently hanging in abstention could swing the Obamacare ruling to a 4-5 loss).

Hopefully, President Biden will have more respect for virtue in law than the impostor that so many people were hoodwinked into accepting.

Paul Wharton
Special thanks to Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY)

Better Drugs and Minor Side Effects

     It is almost impossible to bring to market a drug that cures a major ailment without side effects.

If a patient accepts a prescription from a private doctor for a medicine with great positive effects, but at the same time, the drug has a few, negative side effects, the pharmaceutical company should not be sued.

Considering that the most irresponsible, pill-pushing, medical establishments are government institutions, a better solution than fining Big Pharma would be to completely dismantle Government Health Care.  Too few understand the dynamics of how nearly all of the market ills would disappear under a system of Capitalist Medicine.  Of course, there would still be some minor cases for the court system to clean up; but, that does not involve blindly sticking it to Big Pharma for millions out of envy.

Paul Wharton
Special thanks to Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY)

The Perfect Stock: Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY)

     In 2015, Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY), the Indianapolis based, Big Pharma corporation, has gone up 22%.  As of one year ago, it has increased by 43%.  And, since I bought my stock in the company, less than two years ago, it has added 67% to its value.

The thesis of this blog is my belief that, at this time, Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY) is hosting a triangulation of upside factors that are feeding into a nexus of what I call: "The Perfect Stock".

First, the business is beginning to unveil eminent drugs that it may choose to put onto the market soon in the areas of: rheumatoid arthritis, Alzheimer's, and psoriasis.

Second, the products of hundreds of millions of dollars of research are going towards fueling the best minds with the private mandate to promote Eli Lilly (LLY), discover new science, and do further R&D.

Finally, there are able forces allied with the company that know that if the FDA misbehaves, it will have to be destroyed for a while.  This may not be a common, conventional, Wall Street factor.  But, it is not every company that has an Objectivist intellectual on its wing.

Paul Wharton
Special thanks to Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY)

Present, Future, and Past.

Everything happens in the present

As I have defined, earlier:

Time Change is the synchronized Universal events progression

Time Change Progresses Eternally (See 5/13/15 blog in American Galileo)

It is not hard to conceptualize an infinite future.  However, one may experience more difficulty trying to envision an infinite past.  To assist you, consider the following:

Matter has always been gravitating, but the past is history.

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

Is Space's shape an elliptical solid?

     Whereas:

Matter is something

Mass is matter quantity

Place is where something is

Space is where something could be

The Universe is all matter and space

Gravity is the constant, universal attractive force between all matter that is a metaphysical axiom

Gravity Limits The Universe

Time Change is the synchronized Universal events progression

Time Change Progresses Eternally

Universal Mass is Constant

     Consider the following hypotheses:

(Hypothesis #1): All Force is Gravity (See January 2015 blog)

(Hypothesis #2): If acceleratory forces define Universal Space (where something could be), I hypothesize that Universal matter attracting and being attracted to all other matter results in attempts to orbit around each other matter unit in elliptical patterns.  Considering that this goes on with an eternal future, I propose that Space (where something could be) is a three-dimensional, elliptical solid shape.

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

Universal Mass is Constant

     Whereas:

Matter is something

Mass is matter quantity

Place is where something is

Space is where something could be

The Universe is all matter and space

Gravity is the constant, universal attractive force between all matter that is a metaphysical axiom

Gravity Limits The Universe

Time Change is the synchronized Universal events progression

Time Change Progresses Eternally

Matter can neither be created, nor destroyed

     Therefore:

Universal Mass is Constant

Now the contest begins to identify the one light units total number in The Universe.  This natural number is constant.  It cannot be subtracted from.  And, it cannot be added to.

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics