An Army of Counter Punchers

Months ago, investors in biotech companies suffered heavy sustained losses after Shrillary Clinton's famous anti-Big Pharma tweet.  I struck back in the style of Donald J. Trump--as a "counter puncher".  Now she has done it again, initiating an attack on a Wednesday--which gives enough time for her evil media intellectual allies and short-selling government cronies to cash in on lower stock prices coming up at the end of the trading day on Friday.  So, here's my rebound:

Shrillary's body does not serve the needs of the poor.  She selfishly hoards the value of her different parts in such a way that one could tweet the accusation of "price gouging".  For example, her body generates blood similar to how a pharmaceutical plant manufactures pills.  But, she does not sell her blood at low prices, nor does she give away a lot of it like Big Pharma is coerced into doing with their product.  The blood in Shrillary is there.  The poor need it.  Who is she to profit from robust health and vitality?  Therefore, the government should require that she give half her blood away every week.

Another body part Shrillary is rich in is kidneys.  She has two kidneys for goodness sake!  Shrillary doesn't need both kidneys.  Who is she to walk around kidney-rich while others with an unmet medical need are suffering?  Does "two kidney" Shrillary Clinton really expect to win running as a Democrat when this makes her a hypocrite?  The Democrat Party should demand that she remove one kidney for the race to go on.

(This blog was the response by one man in what I envision as "an army of counter punchers")

Paul Wharton
Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

Television Propaganda Controls

Back in the winter of 2009, before Obama was sworn in, socialist television started to get really bad.  I responded by selling my TV--and have not replaced it with a new one to this day.

The mainstream media is so dishonest, biased, and borders on communist.  I had been following the Trump campaign on-line through what I thought was one of the better media sources, but then found non-traditional footage of the candidate's speaking events in the search engines.  And I'll tell you, it is like night and day!

Something has got to be done to undermine the mainstream media.  While I believe in Freedom of Speech and of the Press, I have a couple of ideas of how to do this without treading on The Constitution.

Most Americans know that the media is skewed; but it seems like we don't know that the majority knows this, too.  So, since for the most part, we don't fund their efforts with advertising views, how are these stations staying in business?  My hypothesis is that they aren't.  I believe that their continued existence is reflective proof of government funding behind the scenes.

One thing that could be done is for a business to invent what could be called: "television propaganda controls".  This could work like the already marketed "parental controls".  An individual who has had enough with certain channels, such as: CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, and/or NBC could program one's electronic devices to skip over the individually selected stations.

Paul Wharton
Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

What's Better than Crooked Hillary?

Trump's name for Clinton says a lot; and I hope he keeps using it.  But, I have thought of an alternative name that I think is even better: Shrillary.

If you listen to her speeches and especially her exclamatory, raised voice at the staged events, Clinton sounds shrill.  Shrillary needs to calm down a bit.  By calling her Shrillary, Trump supporters in effect are helping the situation:

Shhh...Shrillary.  Chill.

Paul Wharton
Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

Literary Thriller: No Time to Die

Kira Peikoff does it again with her outstanding medical thriller: No Time to Die. The book weaves much Objectivism with medicine in an entertaining plot that is perfect for my focus.  The story centers on an elusive and mysterious character who calls himself "Galileo".  As my blog page identity is "American Galileo", it is interesting that both Kira and I conceived such similar names completely independently.

While I don't know if No Time to Die would be considered an official Objectivist novel, the story contains many parallels to Atlas Shrugged.  I especially enjoyed the description of New Mexico--as I spent five summers there where my father did research at Los Alamos.

I'm taking a break before moving on to Kira's third book in order to read Atlas Shrugged for the 10th time.  I just wonder when she will write a thriller with the theme of freedom vs. state mental health.

Paul Wharton
Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter