Abolish All Welfare Now

    In the last couple of weeks, I have been focusing my blogging on finding ways for the tens of thousands of Afghan immigrants to find work so they can have the money to fund their lives in a new country with self-sufficiency.  Tonight, I have come across a news story that reveals that the Biden Administration is setting up a welfare system to cater to these new arrivals that will give them taxpayer funded: food, housing, health care, and cash.  I guess Democrats get so used to handing out our hard-earned dollars, that when an emergency immigration situation emerges, welfare is their knee-jerk reaction.

The solution to all this is to make the Socialists pay.  Welfare must be immediately cut off from all immigrants.  But, let us not stop there.  All welfare in America must be abolished, as well.

If immigrants are given an easy alternative to working for a living, many will slack off and be lured into the welfare rut.  There are currently millions and millions of advertised jobs in America.  Businesses are dying to hire people.  Get rid of the welfare vices, and let people work!

Paul Wharton

Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

No New Afghan Unknowns

    As someone who is attempting to undertake what amounts to a massive industrial engineering problem with the tens of thousands of Afghan refugees and their labor, the dissenting voices against some of my aspirations have finally hit home.

At first the Biden Administration went all in by advocating doubling or tripling the number of random Afghan immigrants that will be flown to America.  Some Congressmen pegged my efforts as a pathway for unlimited Green Cards.  These policy changes and objections raised have not landed on deaf ears.  It is hard enough to succeed in finding a route to self-sufficiency by matching the current Afghan-Americans with available work.  And then there are all the national security concerns.

All this has conclusively led me to embrace the policy I call: "No New Afghan Unknowns".  If dual-citizen Afghans, Green Card holders, or SIVs and their families want to apply to travel to America, they should definitely be given full consideration.  But every shoving and pushing new Afghan unknown?  No way.  Enough is enough.

Paul Wharton

Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

The Value of Afghan Language Skills

    Those of us who support letting most of the newly arrived Afghans stay, so long as they economically support themselves, may be skeptical that the immigrants can earn enough to get by.  Aside from low wage factory or food harvesting work, there may be a difficulty involved in meeting America's self-sufficiency requirement.  However, I have identified a market that few have even touched on.  I call this market: "reverse linguist skills".

When America went into Afghanistan, militarily, there was a desperate scramble to find linguists and translators.  In most cases, America had to find native Afghans to educate with the English language.  Being Afghans in their foundation, loyalty was always a concern and had to be repeatedly assessed.

So now, America has these tens of thousands of Afghans who, among which, speak perhaps every variant of represented languages in their native country.  They are expected to support themselves and mostly have few job skills.  Why not approach them with what could be their most lucrative market--Afghan language education.

There is no denying that there is a big market for the languages of Afghanistan.  Unless he changes his mind, Trump has said we will probably be going back into Afghanistan at some point.  If a future U.S. government official is in school, it may be more valuable to learn an Afghan language than some less valuable one, such as Latin.

As I mentioned above, linguist loyalty has been an issue.  However, these high school and college students who are adding the Afghan languages to their skill set are first and foremost Americans.

Paul Wharton

Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

Recognize Immigrant Freedom to Produce and Trade

    Whether one agrees with unfettered, illegal immigration, or not, it does not change the fact that there are perhaps tens of millions of illegal immigrants currently in this country.  The Democrats don't seem to be doing much about it.  But what is being done is massive spending of American, taxpayer money that is being put into the hands of many immigrants.

What I am advocating in this blog is the recognized political Individual Rights of all immigrants in America (both legal and illegal) to Produce and Trade.  The vast majority of the illegal ones will never be deported anyway.  And, it would do a lot more good if they had the opportunity to support themselves, instead of being stuck on welfare at our expense.

Paul Wharton

Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

What to do About the Afghan Refugees

    There is a new crisis that is an offshoot of Biden's bungling of the Afghanistan pullout.  What should be done about the 50K+ refugees from Afghanistan (many of which had no ties to the Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) program)?  I have given the problem a lot of thought; and I believe that the following procedure should be the process undertaken:

The first step should be to correctly identify which refugees have been issued a SIV.  These individuals should be given an American Work Visa (AWV) which is a card that grants the recipient the politically recognized right to contractually work for any pay according to terms that are completely, freely negotiated with each employer and the AWV holder.  Once the SIV distinguished individual receives this recognition, that person should be released from the processing area to freely travel anywhere one wants in the country.

The next step is to vet the remaining refugees.  Those who fail to pass America's standards are either sent to a different country or restricted in some capacity in ours.  The vast majority of the refugees will pass the vetting process.  When one of these individuals is cleared, an American Work Visa (AWV) is issued that grants the same freedom as the SIV predecessors.

The question could be raised by Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) holders: Why did I bother to achieve the SIV status?  Joe Biden made it very difficult to find room for you to get out of Afghanistan.  After he initially removed most of our military, prematurely, there were desperate restrictions in trying to evacuate from the Kabul airport.  America had to put Americans as the priority.  All I can really say is that some of you SIV holders may have gotten out because of your American aid, whereas without it, you never would have succeeded.  It is indeed terrible what has happened to those left behind because of one man's spite for President Trump's benevolent plan.

Paul Wharton

Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

Biden's Afghanistan Explained

    After witnessing the Biden Administration's colossal disaster in Afghanistan, I have been in wonder at media commentators who project the possible shortcomings of the Democrats as a series of miscalculations.

The shortfall was not the lack of trying to do good policy.  The Biden Administration wanted America to fail.  Their thought processes were the following:

Trump's plan was to completely pull out of Afghanistan.  If the Democrats can leave Afghanistan in a bad way, then Trump will be blamed for having a bad agenda.

It doesn't take much thinking to conclude that Trump's Afghanistan policy: wouldn't have left a lot of vulnerable Americans behind, wouldn't have left behind thousands of Afghan allies who we promised refuge to because they helped us, wouldn't have left tens of billions worth of high-tech military equipment behind to be seized and used by our enemies, and, wouldn't have left intact American-built, operational military bases.

I wonder if we are going to start to hear the argument that America failed in Afghanistan because of the complete military pullout that was Trump's idea.

Paul Wharton

Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

Why You Should Want Capitalist Medicine

    There is a battle in America between Government Health Care and Capitalist Medicine that Government Health Care is winning.  In this blog post, I will discuss what the two alternatives are and why you should want Capitalist Medicine.

Government Health Care is where the state takes care of you with force.  The government decides what health care it doles out to you--if you get anything at all.  In most cases where you receive the state's care, it is not something you want.  This could be less than you would like, or more--such as the injection of a mind-altering drug with nasty side effects.  In cases of serious medical need, you often won't be able to get a desired medical operation, or perhaps will be forced to receive something potentially dangerous to your health--such as experimental brain surgery against your will.  The basic concept is that the government is in control.

The opposite, alternative system is Capitalist Medicine.  Under Capitalism, you have the freedom to look for medical professionals to offer to hire--such as: doctors, hospital staff, and private care givers.  Since Government Health Care didn't wipe out their market, they actually still exist to offer medical services to you for payment.  For example, despite the drastic erosion of private medicine, I personally, still pay to see three private doctors at separate offices, in exchange for existing medical services.  The freelance, private, family practice doctor has made recommendations to me over the many years I have seen him that have saved me sometimes tens of thousands of dollars.  Other times, he has told me of therapies (such as one that used a government facility) that I didn't want to do; and I told him "No."  You see, in Capitalist Medicine, you have that freedom!

One issue, that I don't think that most people understand, is what I call: "the sensation of health care".  Health Care procedures are marked by pain.  This can range anywhere from the internal side effect reactions to a nasty drug, to the perception of a scalpel cutting open a conscious patient because a hospital is low on anesthetics.  You either don't get health care, or you get a low-quality, painful operation.  The scarcity in health care is like Civil War times when the military surgeons kept going for coffee breaks to stay awake cutting off everyone's arms and legs.

But it isn't just that Government Health Care is full of examples of health care you don't want.  It's opposite, Capitalist Medicine, is full of the wonders of technology and healing that you do--assuming that you can pay the market-sustaining fee to enhance or save your life.

In Government Health Care, medicine mostly does not exist.  In Capitalist Medicine, the state does not take care of you.

Paul Wharton

Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

Whatever Happened to Repealing Obamacare?

    Covid America is obsessed with fighting a virus with Government Health Care.  The only exceptions, that I see, are the private efforts to produce therapies and vaccines--as well as the voluntary decisions by company management to require such things as mandatory vaccination to work.  But, government agencies, such as the FDA, still interfere in the private sector by requiring approval to sell a Big Pharma or Biotech product--if the government allows a private sale at all.

Think back six years to the political climate concerning medicine in America.  Whatever happened to repealing Obamacare?  After the disaster of the "Affordable Care Act" (ACA), Americans were fired up to get rid of Government Health Care once and for all.  I wrote blogs explaining that it's opposite is Capitalist Medicine, and that Capitalism in the medical profession should be the goal to strive for.

Trump was really good for America; but he never had the conviction that Capitalism was the ideal for American Medicine.  I remember one debate among the Republicans running for President where Senator Ted Cruz pointed out that Trump in fact supports Government Health Care.  After a four-year Presidency, I tend to agree with that more than I had hoped for.

Americans need to get back on the track that they began with defying the policies of Obamacare.  And it's not just an extreme assertion of Socialism in the medical field.  Americans need to dump Government Health Care--all of it!  Capitalist Medicine is the moral political environment--because it is the economic one that government only interferes with when there is non-contracted force, or fraud.

Paul Wharton

Objectivist Capitalism Medicine Promoter

Covid Verses Natural Mortality

    As the world learned more and more about the Coronavirus, it became known that that flu was statistically much more deadly to older individuals than the young.  In America's battle, the government took over and converted most hospitals to be treatment centers that tried to save people.

In following the events that unfolded from the beginning, I became outraged when I learned that many government hospital efforts were tallying Covid mortality as deaths by that virus whether or not the individuals who died had multiple, medical afflictions.  I read that this was being done partly because Government Health Care would get more funding according to the level of need that the elevated Covid mortality numbers demonstrated.

This aggregate number had a secondary effect--in that it wooed Americans into perceiving that many more have died from the pandemic than actually did.

I researched some numbers and found a few relevant statistics:

(1) 328 million is the approximate population of The United States

(2) 78.5 years is the approximate average life expectancy in The United State

(3) 613 thousand deaths have been claimed to have been caused by Covid since the beginning of the pandemic in The United States [in about 1.5 years]

These are common statistical measures that are used; but, I thought I would develop a new one that could be of interest in the investigation of Covid vs. Natural Mortality.

(U.S. population) / (Avg. U.S. life expectancy) = (Avg. U.S. deaths expected per year)

(328 million individuals) / (78.5 years of life) = (4.18 million individual deaths per year)

So, according to the government and public hospital administrators, ((613 thousand Covid deaths) / (1.5 years)) / ((4,180 thousand Normal deaths) / (1 year)) = (about 10% of all deaths in America each year that are caused by Covid).

Is that what the private medical professionals are telling us?  10% of all U.S. deaths in the last year and a half have been caused by Covid?  Common sense says that's a little high and that Government Health Care is lying to us.

Paul Wharton

Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

They're Private Companies!

    Trump has announced his lawsuits against what he calls "Big Tech".  Despite being a Republican, which is supposed to be the party that defends business, Trump is turning against the Conservative base.

Not long after the initiation of Trump's litigation, the Biden Administration, seeing that Trump has made a mistake, has joined onto the feeding frenzy against Big Business.  The Democrats see an opportunity to attack Capitalism, as the most popular Republican politician, and ex-businessman, has started down that road.

It's too bad that Americans have to fight both parties on this issue.  But our main argument is clear:

They're private companies!  If one doesn't like the actions of Twitter, Facebook, and Google, just don't use them.  There are other, less popular alternatives.  And, if those Mega-Cap Social Media Titans make enough people unsatisfied, the economic opportunity to create more, alternative (and, possibly more inclusive) competitors grows.

I have to admit that I thought Trump was setting himself up to produce a new Social Media site.  But instead, he sold out his position on Capitalism and Big Business.

It's not too late for Trump to back down from his lawsuits.  I really hope he abandons them and refocuses on his Maga Social Media business.

Paul Wharton

Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

Big Socialist Social Media

    President Trump's 2020 campaign was heavily influenced by the ideologically, socialist driven, social media companies, such as Twitter and Facebook.  It is understandable that he is very angry at those companies and wants revenge.  However, many Republicans are appealing to his rage in the wrong way.

First of all, it isn't "Big Tech" that is at fault.  To be precise, it's "Big Socialist Social Media".  To broaden the guilt to the entire technology sector of the economy is like targeting "Big Food" due to an agricultural, e-coli outbreak.  Or, to give another example, it's like targeting "Big Internal Combustion Engine" due to a car company's recall of some auto parts.

Several Republican politicians are taking up the mantle of a crusade against "Big Tech" in Washington.  I have seen footage of otherwise, liberty-friendly Congressmen allude to the parallel between modern day "Big Tech" and how the Anti-Trust laws were wielded against Standard Oil and other business Titans.  How can Conservatives think that voters will perceive them as Capitalists if they follow through on such persecution?

Recently, Trump has begun to get on the right track by investing in his own Big Social Media entity.  This is the way his battle should be fought--with media he ultimately controls, and with the freedom to publish and remove the content and individuals that he sees fit.

Paul Wharton

Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

Debt, Accountability, and the Coming War

    Let's face it.  The U.S. government is going to keep putting this country further and further into debt with no stop in sight.  Not only is the current Democrat administration pushing to borrow 6 trillion more in just it's first year; but Trump did the same thing with the Coronavirus checks.

The country is heading into a fiscal debt default; and there are two possible pathways.  The first is to pay off the debt.  However, with no serious effort being made now to begin to do this, and the interest on the trillions and trillions posing an impossibility to actually get it done, the second path is the likely one.

The U.S. is borrowing money from somewhere.  I don't know too much about it; but I've heard that China is the main donor.  When the U.S. declares a debt default, do you really think that China will say, "Oh well!", and turn the other way?  They will go to war with our country, and with good reason.  Militarily, a country's moral cause is a major factor in any conflict.  America fought the Revolutionary War to gain Independence.  The North fought the Civil War mainly to abolish slavery.  And, America declared war on Japan in response to the attack on Pearl Harbor.

There are some of us Americans who: don't accept welfare, try to avoid using socialized services, and won't cash Coronavirus checks.  Personally, I have a hard time keeping a spotless record of morality in my convictions--especially when I have to drive around on public roads for work, and find Coronavirus checks automatically subtracted from my tax dues and $1,400 electronically forced into my bank account without my consent.

But, for those truly guilty Americans, who soak welfare for whatever they can get, I think they should be served a Conscription Card for mandatory participation in the coming war.  Since they are the really guilty ones who have gotten us into this mess, they should be the drafted soldiers who are forced to fight to defend the system they support.

Paul Wharton

Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

 

Aristotle Completed

    Yesterday, I finished reading The Complete Works of Aristotle: Volume II, edited by Jonathan Barnes.  I had already read Volume I, which I was working on during the time that I started my blog: American Galileo.  Together, the two tomes amount to 2,465 pages.  However, after reading the entire first Volume, which included some chapters that were questioned to be authentic Aristotle, I decided to skip those parts offered in Volume II.

    Aristotle is not the only reading that I have been engaged with.  I am rereading three other books in the Objectivist literature:

(1)  Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology, by Ayn Rand & edited by Harry Binswanger and Leonard Peikoff.  307 pgs.  (being read for the fourth time).

(2)  The Logical Leap: Induction in Physics, by David Harriman with contributions by Leonard Peikoff.  257 pgs.  (being read for the eighth time).

(3)  Atlas Shrugged, by Ayn Rand.  1069 pgs.  (being read for the eleventh time).

Paul Wharton

Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

Whartonian Dynamics (so far...)

    The following is my current progress towards a greater encompassing dynamics system:

(Deduction)(Induction) = 1

All Matter is Light

Mass = (M) = Matter Quantity = Light Quantity

Light can neither be created, nor destroyed

Mass Range is a Natural Number no larger than the Light Units Quantity in The Universe

Gravity is the Constant, Universal Attractive Force between All Matter That is a Metaphysical Axiom

 

point = One Light's Gravitational Center

Distance Change = The Linear, Absolute Value Difference Between Where one point Was and Where It Is

Distance Change =  Line = (DC) = Wavelength

Area = (DC)(DC) = Magnitude of Amplitude

Volume = (DC)(DC)(DC)

Sound = (1)(DC)(DC)(DC)(R) = Frequency of Volume

Soundspeed = Sound / Area

One light unit's Distance Change Range is a Positive Number no larger than that light unit's Maximum Linear Distance Change Possible

One light unit is a Three Dimensional Object

One light unit has the Same Shape as Each other light unit

Possible = Limits

Mass Limits Volume

Volume Denotes Potential Size

Place = Where Light Is

Space = Where Light Could Be

Density = Place / Space

The Universe = All Light and Space

(The Universe) = (Range Possible)(Light)

Matter Defines Space

Mass = Density of Volume

Time Change = (TC) = The Synchronized Universal Events Progression

Rate = (R) = 1 / (TC) = Frequency

Time Change Range is a Positive Number

Time Change Progresses Eternally

Frequency = Hertz / Cycle

Lightspeed = (1)(DC)(R) = Universal Constant Center Velocity

Light Attraction = (1)(DC)(R)(R) = Universal Constant Center Acceleration

One Light Motion = The Square Root of((Lightspeed)(Gravity))

Heat = A Light's Motion with More Direction Changes

Chill = A Light's Motion with Fewer Direction Changes

Friction = Reducing Motion Force = Resistance = Drag

 

Light Causes Gravity

Gravity Limits The Universe

Momentum = (M)(DC)(R) = Inertia

Force = (M)(DC)(R)(R)

Energy = (M)(DC)(DC)(R)(R) = Temperature = Work

Power = (M)(DC)(DC)(R)(R)(R) = Focus

Reign = (M)(DC)(DC)(R)(R)(R)(R) = Potential

Drive = (M)(DC)(DC)(DC)(R)(R)(R)(R) = Charge

Thrust = (M)(DC)(DC)(DC)(R)(R)(R)(R)(R) = Burst

Surge = (M)(DC)(DC)(DC)(R)(R)(R)(R)(R)(R) = Burn

(Lift)(Weight) = 1

Trajectory = The Cube Root of((Roll)(Pitch)(Yaw))

Pressure = (M)(R)(R) / (DC) = Compression

Pulse = Rate of Pitch

Field = (M)(DC)(DC)(DC)(R)(R) = Line of Work

Everything's Mechanical

(1)(Electron) = (x)(Light)

Electricity = (e) = Electron Quantity

Current = (e)(Flow)

Viscosity = Friction of Flow

A is A = A is A

is = is

= is =

plus = adding what's next

minus = subtracting what's next

of = multiplied by

per = divided by

Fusion = (2)light

Notation is a necessary footnote that denotes measurement identity

Value is a Concept's Number

Concept is Value of Notation

Value = Quantity

Ecology = Natural Dynamics

Everything in The Universe is Happening in the Present

Metachemics Laws are the Same Everywhere in The Universe

The Universe was Not Created

The Universe is Just Light Rearranging Itself

The Universe is Everlasting

Torque = ?

Revolution = ?

Refraction = ?

Conduction = ?

Magnetism = ?

Paul Wharton

Father of Metachemics

More Dynamic Formulas

       This post is under construction due to some needed editing.

Paul Wharton

Father of Metachemics

New Metachemics 2.0 Formula

    This post is under construction due to some needed editing.

Paul Wharton

Father of Metachemics