Odds Are The Earth Was Seeded

    This blog seeks to apply my Metachemics philosophy to the question whether or not The Earth was seeded with life rather than originating its life from inanimate matter.  Consider the following Metachemical tenants:

(1) Matter can neither be created nor destroyed.

(2) Time Change progresses eternally.

(3) Present Man has demonstrated a desire to seed The Universe with artificially created life.

So, if Man has created life-replicating "pods" on Earth, then odds are that intelligent life on other Earth-like planets have done the same.  Note, though, the chances that fully developed human fetuses could travel the distance from these other planets to Earth is very slim.  The less mass a life-carrying "pod" has, the faster and farther it can travel.  While it is true that The Earth may well have been "seeded", it was probably from microscopic life forms in size; and Man evolved from those.

Paul Wharton

Father of Metachemics

A Great American Auction

    The Objectivist philosophy has a specific view on what a legitimate government should include.  Ayn Rand wrote:

"The proper functions of a government fall into three broad categories, all of them involving the issues of physical force and the protection of men's rights: the police, to protect men from criminals--the armed services, to protect men from foreign invaders--the law courts, to settle disputes among men according to objective laws." (Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal, p.384).  It has since been clarified that an Objectivist government also requires diplomacy and treasury functions.  But, that's it!  These five sectors: police, military, judicial, diplomatic, and treasury are the only existing parts of a legitimate government.

So, how does one go from the present, to where a government should be?  That is the subject of this blog.

The current violations of individual rights by illegitimate government primarily involve the possession of "public property" where the government has no legitimacy being.  This should all be sold off at auction.  Of course, the five sectors will retain limited, necessary capital assets, (i.e., police stations, military bases, courthouses, embassies, and treasury holding structures).

It is my personal strategy to leave all of the five sectors and their assets completely alone for about 3-5 years, after which time important changes should be made.  This is to prevent petty quarrels over minor laws and the friction of downsizing sectors that are fundamentally good and on our side.

A Great American Auction involves two accumulations of piles of money in each State--the part of the Federal that goes towards the one enormous U.S. Federal pile, and the State pile.  Suppose one has resided and worked in Illinois for one's entire life.  The two piles that one receives exposure to are the Illinois State auction proceeds and the U.S. Federal auction proceeds.  The concept is that one should get back the fraction of what was taken according to the size of an auction proceeds.  However, generally, the only taxations on record are the State and Federal income taxes.  Because of this, I argue that only recorded income taxes should determine the returns.

There are a couple of preliminary government functions that must be exercised before a Great American Auction.  First, an income tax records processing office must be set up for each of the 51 auctions.  Between individuals and government compiling records, an auction pile percentage should be assigned to each individual who has had exposure to income tax in each of the 51 that is applicable.  Then, when the deadline for submissions and compilation expires, a fraction which represents the multiplier of the total auctioned proceeds in each of the 51 auctions must be assigned to each individual who qualifies.

The other ongoing task that will have to be sponsored is the identification and division of all "public property" that will be put up for auction to become private property.  This will include some systems that logically should be auctioned as one unit, and some parts that may be difficult, but necessary to divide.  For example, consider roads.  All non-legitimate government roads should be private.  But, this does not mean that a would-be Road Tycoon should be pushed into biding a much larger amount of money than what he wants to for the roads he wants.  To give an example of what the auction division officials could do is to separate road segments block by block.  Once private property is one's own, one can do what one wants with it.  One could even tear up the concrete of a former one block section of road and build more houses there, etc.

The identification of all individual parts up for auction will have to have a specific deadline, just as the auction itself will have to begin on a certain day and end on a certain day and at a specific time.  I propose that the auctions begin next year on April 15th, and the deadline for determining all pile fraction multipliers and the selecting of all parts up for auction be identified six months earlier on October 15th of this year.  This six month gap between knowing the parts that will be auctioned and having the auctions is important because it gives bidders time to speculate.  Those who have fractions of auction piles that one will get back should encourage speculation.  It means even more money to be returned.

There is a famous Ayn Rand Bookstore book, which I have read, called, The Commanding Heights.  It chronicles Margaret Thatcher's dismantling of some of England's socialized government parts that had no legitimate role in government.  Thatcher's method was to get rid of these sections, but not directly return any of the value back to those who had been taxed.  This is not the way to go about A Great American Auction.

I am calling my system of ideas in this blog: A Great American Auction.  But, this does not have to be specific to the U.S.A.  Any country on Earth can carry out my ideas which are rooted in Ayn Rand's philosophy.

Paul Wharton

Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

Language and War

    In this blog, I will discuss the tremendous relationship between language and war and how not having a communicational language can spell the difference between victory or defeat.

Imagine, for a moment, that one is a diplomatic envoy sent to the negotiations for a possible peace treaty, but with one problem.  One has had no exposure to the enemy's language.  When one speaks, the foreign party seems very confused.  And, when they speak, it just sounds like strung together noise.  Aside to the possibility of there being a translator brought along, there is no hope for a treaty being created and understood.

Language is so important in war.  It is important in coordinating the actions of the dominantly understood side.  It is important in rallying the minority language participants.  And, if one ever finds oneself deep in enemy territory, or assigned the task of translating an opponent's progress, it is crucial to have a grasp of their language or languages.

Indeed, at times a language barrier can be the only obstacle between a successful alliance and an uncertain misunderstanding.  History is full of examples of an advancing army encountering a tribal force that speaks an unknown language.  This potential military ally may want to join one's side.  But, without simple communication, the opportunity is lost.

I believe that the interconnections between language and war are vast.  And, if one digs into History, there are volumes that could be written on the relationship.  In Europe there have been so many wars that students are sometimes encouraged to learn: 3, 4, or 5 different languages due to the geographic situation there.  I am not suggesting that America should break from a usual 1 foreign language tradition in its isolated geography.  But, I do view the present, common curriculum as perhaps a wise way to go partly because of the very real potential for war.

Paul Wharton

Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

Non-Voters, Not Illegals

    Having put in a lot of time wrestling with the issue of "illegal" immigration, and seeing what kind of a practical nightmare it has become, I think I am compelled to post in my blog the solution which I have recently discovered.

I will begin with what now is, and then, analyze the problems that did exist in what has been:

An individual who is not a Citizen who comes into America from a foreign land, or by sea, is called a "Non-Voter".  A Non-Voter is not considered an "Illegal", as the word has been tossed around so loosely in the past.  While a Non-Voter is free to travel where one wants and offer to work where one wants, the Non-Voter status means that the individual can never vote in America for a person running for a political office or a proposed law on any ballot.

There are a few obligations that newly arrived Non-Voters have.  A Non-Voter must be cleared of the three possible scenarios that can reject one's domestic American status:

(1) A Non-Voter cannot be a criminal on the run for a significant offense.

(2) A Non-Voter cannot be a carrier of a contagious, significant disease.

(3) A Non-Voter cannot be a spy planning or having carried out serious espionage.

The only other major obligation is that a Non-Voter must register for, and soon receive, a Federal State ID (i.e., an American identification).  This is necessary because government officials, such as police or polling officials, have to know who a Non-Voter is and where that Non-Voter is residing.

Now, let's cross-apply the new "Non-Voter" immigration philosophy with the "Illegal" philosophy of the past:

Under the "Illegal" model, there are tens of millions of Illegal aliens in America.  It has been said that no one knows exactly how many.  I am just going to estimate it at 30 million.  The "Illegal" school of thought says that America does not have to send back 100% for the rest of the "Illegals" to get the message.  But, even if that would have the practical effect, consider what sending back just 3 million individuals would cost. It is not practical.

The focus is on what is best for America.  And factoring in the boost to the U.S. economy--especially low-cost labor related goods--a massive number of working Non-Voters is a great thing.  But, look also at the effect on the soon not to be denied neighbors.  No longer does one have to live in anxiety of a midnight raid, or the next knock at the door.  No longer is one lured into the only ways to make a little money, such as prostitution or the drug trade.

If one gives the argument that health care, government school, public housing, etc... is too expensive, I just respond that these things do not exist in government--neither for Non-Voters, nor Citizens.

And then there is the denied "voter status".  Are these poor Non-Voters soon to be aching and wallowing in sorrow at their lost franchise?  Certainly not!  Imagine that you have been a hunted, hopeless want-to-be worker, never able to stay in one place for long.  You would be glad to give up a vote.  Look what you have to gain!

In summary, I want to demonstrate just one example that leads to everything that is now possible.  The following is a hopefully soon to be adopted script for American Border Guards patrolling north of the southern border:

Border Guard: "Repeat after me."  "I swear by my Honor that I will never vote in the United States of America for a person or law on any political ballot for the rest of my entire life."

Non-Voters: {Repeated vow}

Border Guard: "O.K.  You Non-Voters are free to proceed."

Paul Wharton

Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

Whartonian Crunch Theory

    In my studies of Objectivist philosophy and its Aristotelian base, I have usually stuck to promoting Ayn Rand and her allied authors.  However, my experiences over the years have led to several philosophical discoveries that I am mainly only able to credit to myself.  One of these new fields is what I call: Crunch Theory.

The basic tenant of Crunch Theory is that most of the evil in The Universe is caused by individuals reacting to being Crunched.

So, what is a Crunch?

A Crunch is when a fundamental requirement for one's survival, or teleological desire being pursued, is not being satiated properly.  This can range from the most basic of the types of one's life needs--such as: drinking water, food, thermo-regulatory status, sleep, money, transportation, and, (in the case of wartime), such tools as weapons and ammunition--to more sophisticated motivations.

While Crunch Theory does not advocate becoming an altruist open to every charity case that comes by, if one finds oneself in a bind, it really helps if one can understand what is driving a hoard of: hungry, thirsty, or out of work individuals in one's proximity causing oneself a problem.  Maybe there are a few moral ones who do deserve some help.  And, maybe, simply letting someone have a drink of water can lead to saving one's life.

There is one other type of individual in The Universe that causes evil.  This is the Non-Crunched evil doer. This type seeks for evil to be done, but, is not propelled by a Crunch reaction.  It can be very difficult to deal with this type, as no simple donation will relieve an attack for long.

In summary, Crunches are bad.  Any time a fundamentally good and moral individual can be relieved of an easily alleviated Crunch, it is a basic good in The Universe.  However, one must be vigilant to guarding against creating a charity case from one's generosity, and, above all else, be on the lookout for self-propelled Non-Crunched evil.

Paul Wharton

Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

 

Grievances Against Joseph Biden

    WHEN in a Constitutionally Limited Republic's course it becomes Necessary for a Citizenry to Right a wrongfully reported election result that has placed a socialist upon an illusionary throne over the American Peoples' government, it becomes Necessary to Express the Reasons and misdeeds that have Led Us to this Resolve.  Prudence, indeed, will Argue that a Removal of a reported president could result in the baring of a corruption tarnished state, and that the government would then suffer an embarrassing reputation.  But, after More than a year of Joseph Biden's driving descent of America to an increasing and increasing level of socialism, it becomes Apparent that the leftist political powers and corrupted, economic intellectuals intend to drive us still deeper towards absolute communism.  It Should be Understood that the labels of tyranny and dictatorship need not be discussed in Alerting American Knowledge--as President Trump's Political Victory in 2020 is Already Widely Known.

     Some Good Americans have, though being Frustrated, resigned themselves to the attitude that they will ride out the storm until the next Presidential vote in 2024.  And, in fact I too, the Author of This Document, have been, for many months, in accordance with the same sentiment as these Americans--with the creeping socialism and communism being slow enough for me to find ways to manage my heartbreak when I would read the news of my Beloved Country.  I would think, "Well, I'll just have to buy less expensive food.", or, "I'll just have to pay more for gas.", or, "I'll just have to pay more taxes.".  Perhaps, the hardships could have been borne.  Perhaps, I could have been accommodating to the march into communism.  Perhaps, I could have been blind to the fact that, realistically, there will never be fair and honest elections again in America.

    Up until now, what has negatively affected me, mainly, has been economical hardship.  But, in the last month, Joseph Biden and the administration running the American presidency have been botching up Global Military Dynamics so badly that, if you have been keeping up with the news, you can see that we are on the brink of a nuclear war.  It is one thing to suffer chills because of a scaled back heating bill.  But, it is an entirely different matter to be on the periphery of a nuclear impact where one suffers the searing pain of burns for five minutes until one finally dies.

Restore President Trump to His Presidency!  I Won't Take it Anymore!

Paul Wharton

Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter