Light Moves Lightspeed Between Direction Changes

I have struggled with expressing my concept of light and its motion in this blog.  Tonight, I thought of a new way to explain it that preserves my first two principles:

(1)  All Matter is Light

(2)  Light always moves Lightspeed

My new addition is:

(3)  Light moves Lightspeed between Direction Changes

Paul Wharton

Father of Metachemics

Human Mortality: A Pre-Existing Condition

When politicians talk about "covering" pre-existing conditions, I never hear them discuss the most deadly killer of them all that ranks more fatal than any other disease.  That condition is human mortality.

There are two types of laws that hold up the banner of "covering" pre-existing conditions: those that compel the private sector or those that stand alone in the public sector.  No matter what laws are passed: to claim that a private business covers human mortality is a lie, to claim that the public sector prevents human mortality is force.

I don't know about you, but, if I reach the age of 110, I would rather live my final weeks at home than be stuck in some socialist hell hole while life-extending medicine tries to turn me into a national treasure.

Republicans: Stop lying about the unpleasant topic of human mortality!

Democrats: Stop taking other individuals' money and using it to force painful operations onto individuals who don't want them!

Paul Wharton

Objectivist Capitalist Medicine Promoter

Lament for Squirrel Hill

I am outraged by the news of the Synagogue shooting in the Squirrel Hill neighborhood of Pittsburgh.  Not only did I grow up in Pittsburgh from ages 3 to 12, but, we actually lived in Squirrel Hill for those 9 years.  That area has a large Jewish population and is commonly known as a Jewish Community.  Many of my friends were Jewish.  Our neighbors were Jewish.  And, I attended a private school next to a Jewish Community Center building which we would walk over to in order to have gym class in its big, basement pool.  While walking through that building, I remember seeing art pictures on the walls portraying horrific images that I learned were drawn by Jews who were still dealing with the nightmares of Nazi Germany.  You see, I am 46 years old; and my childhood took place only a few decades after Hitler.  Many of those who were children during WWII were not really that old back when I lived in Squirrel Hill.

In regard to the individual who decided to murder the innocent people of Squirrel Hill, which had become a safe haven--healing the memories of history's senseless carnage, I have one observation.  He made a big mistake in surviving his act.  Trump is going to eat him alive.

Paul Wharton

Eternal Time Change Implications

Time Change is the Synchronized Universal Events Progression

Existence Exists

Time Change Progresses Eternally

Universal Matter has Always Existed

Matter can neither be created, nor destroyed

Some have wondered whether there is a historical beginning to Universal Matter.  Others claim that there will be an end.  But, in fact, The Universe acting through Progressing Time Change will always exist--and always has.

What are the above implications to Universal Life?  It means that Earth-like Planets bearing Life for Billions of Years has happened more than a Trillion times before, and will happen over and over again with no end.

Paul Wharton

Father of Metachemics

Why Small Tech?

In December 2016, I posted a blog in American Galileo titled:  Read The Chip to Understand Small Tech.  The article explained why I thought that the best investment in Tech was "Small Tech".  However, I did not mean small tech companies.  All other factors being even, one should always invest in the biggest company.

My thesis is that small technology products will undergo the most innovation and growth.  Here's why:

If you look at the state of modern physics, the areas that are the most irrational, (and thus wrong), are those dealing with the micro-world.  I grew up the son of a nuclear physicist.  My father used to say to me such things as: "But, in the micro-world, Newton's laws break down."  Modern physicists do not understand (as Ayn Rand called it) little stuff.

So, as far as the economic market is concerned, what will happen if someone fixes the science that is supposed to reflect micro-physics (as well as other scientific specialties that are used in generating small tech products)?  I say it would result in an economic boom led by Big Small Tech product companies.

I have already made some progress in the goal of fixing micro-science.  My motive is money more than fame.  So, the following are my three positions for anyone else who likes my strategy:


Intel (INTC)

Intel (INTC) is the biggest U.S. based semiconductor company.  I'm invested in semiconductors for their: micro-complexity, proper science-dependent delicateness, and foundational macro-economic position.  Intel (INTC) is also involved in many other science-driven Small Tech product areas.  I read somewhere that their private R&D dwarfs all competitors, as well.

Microsoft (MSFT)

With the booming technological hardware market, software will be in huge demand.  What better company than Microsoft (MSFT)?  In recent decades the company has branched more and more into hardware components of their own which gives it a similar play as Intel (INTC).  Microsoft (MSFT) is known as a company that has many of the smartest people working there--partly due to it's hiring practices which is always a plus in my book.

Vertex Pharmaceuticals (VRTX)

This is a biotech company that many of you may never have heard of.  I've read two books about them and view the Vertex (VRTX) employee team as the best I know of in all of Big Cap Biotech.  They are pros at science and business.  Despite being biological, bio-technology reduces down to small tech science as much as any other field.


Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

Whartonian Dynamics Definitions

The following 10 blogs in June 2018 are a dynamics definitions series.  While the list is not comprehensive because I am limiting the definitions to 3 terms for simplicity's sake, all definitions presented are true.  Also, I am abstaining from using the division function--staying strictly with "multiplied by", which manifests itself as the function "of" (See my blog in April 2018).

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

Dynamics Definitions: Velocity

Mass = (M)
Distance Change = (DC)
Rate = (R) = (1 / Time Change)

Velocity = (1)(DC)(R)

Velocity is:

Rate of Distance Change
Distance Change of Rate

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

Dynamics Definitions: Acceleration

Mass = (M)
Distance Change = (DC)
Rate = (R) = (1 / Time Change)

Velocity = (1)(DC)(R)
Acceleration = (1)(DC)(R)^2

Acceleration is:

Rate of Velocity
Rate of Rate of Distance Change
Velocity of Rate
Rate of Distance Change of Rate
Distance Change of Rate of Rate

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

Dynamics Definitions: Momentum

Mass = (M)
Distance Change = (DC)
Rate = (R) = (1 / Time Change)

Velocity = (1)(DC)(R)
Acceleration = (1)(DC)(R)^2
Momentum = (M)(DC)(R)

Momentum is:

Velocity of Mass
Rate of Distance Change of Mass
Mass of Velocity
Distance Change of Rate of Mass
Distance Change of Mass of Rate
Rate of Mass of Distance Change
Mass of Rate of Distance Change
Mass of Distance Change of Rate

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

Dynamics Definitions: Force

Mass = (M)
Distance Change = (DC)
Rate = (R) = (1 / Time Change)

Velocity = (1)(DC)(R)
Acceleration = (1)(DC)(R)^2
Momentum = (M)(DC)(R)
Force = (M)(DC)(R)^2

Force is:

Rate of Momentum
Acceleration of Mass
Rate of Velocity of Mass
Momentum of Rate
Mass of Acceleration
Velocity of Rate of Mass
Velocity of Mass of Rate
Rate of Mass of Velocity
Mass of Rate of Velocity
Mass of Velocity of Rate

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

Dynamics Definitions: Energy

Mass = (M)
Distance Change = (DC)
Rate = (R) = (1 / Time Change)

Velocity = (1)(DC)(R)
Acceleration = (1)(DC)(R)^2
Momentum = (M)(DC)(R)
Force = (M)(DC)(R)^2
Energy = (M)(DC)^2(R)^2

Energy is:

Distance Change of Force
Rate of Distance Change of Momentum
Velocity of Momentum
Acceleration of Distance Change of Mass
Velocity of Velocity of Mass
Force of Distance Change
Distance Change of Rate of Momentum
Distance Change of Momentum of Rate
Rate of Momentum of Distance Change
Momentum of Rate of Distance Change
Momentum of Distance Change of Rate
Momentum of Velocity
Distance Change of Acceleration of Mass
Distance Change of Mass of Acceleration
Acceleration of Mass of Distance Change
Mass of Distance Change of Acceleration
Mass of Acceleration of Distance Change
Velocity of Mass of Velocity
Mass of Velocity of Velocity

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

Dynamics Definitions: Power

Mass = (M)
Distance Change = (DC)
Rate = (R) = (1 / Time Change)

Velocity = (1)(DC)(R)
Acceleration = (1)(DC)(R)^2
Momentum = (M)(DC)(R)
Force = (M)(DC)(R)^2
Energy = (M)(DC)^2(R)^2
Power = (M)(DC)^2(R)^3

Power is:

Rate of Energy
Rate of Distance Change of Force
Velocity of Force
Rate of Velocity of Momentum
Acceleration of Momentum
Mass of Velocity of Acceleration
Energy of Rate
Distance Change of Rate of Force
Distance Change of Force of Rate
Rate of Force of Distance Change
Force of Rate of Distance Change
Force of Distance Change of Rate
Force of Velocity
Velocity of Rate of Momentum
Velocity of Momentum of Rate
Rate of Momentum of Velocity
Momentum of Rate of Velocity
Momentum of Velocity of Rate
Momentum of Acceleration
Velocity of Mass of Acceleration
Velocity of Acceleration of Mass
Mass of Acceleration of Velocity
Acceleration of Mass of Velocity
Acceleration of Velocity of Mass

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

Dynamics Definitions: Reign

Mass = (M)
Distance Change = (DC)
Rate = (R) = (1 / Time Change)

Velocity = (1)(DC)(R)
Acceleration = (1)(DC)(R)^2
Momentum = (M)(DC)(R)
Force = (M)(DC)(R)^2
Energy = (M)(DC)^2(R)^2
Power = (M)(DC)^2(R)^3
Reign = (M)(DC)^2(R)^4

Reign is:

Rate of Power
Rate of Rate of Energy
Rate of Velocity of Force
Acceleration of Force
Rate of Acceleration of Momentum
Mass of Acceleration of Acceleration
Power of Rate
Rate of Energy of Rate
Energy of Rate of Rate
Velocity of Rate of Force
Velocity of Force of Rate
Rate of Force of Velocity
Force of Rate of Velocity
Force of Velocity of Rate
Force of Acceleration
Acceleration of Rate of Momentum
Acceleration of Momentum of Rate
Rate of Momentum of Acceleration
Momentum of Rate of Acceleration
Momentum of Acceleration of Rate
Acceleration of Mass of Acceleration
Acceleration of Acceleration of Mass

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

Dynamics Definitions: Drive

Mass = (M)
Distance Change = (DC)
Rate = (R) = (1 / Time Change)

Velocity = (1)(DC)(R)
Acceleration = (1)(DC)(R)^2
Momentum = (M)(DC)(R)
Force = (M)(DC)(R)^2
Energy = (M)(DC)^2(R)^2
Power = (M)(DC)^2(R)^3
Reign = (M)(DC)^2(R)^4
Drive = (M)(DC)^3(R)^4

Drive is:

Distance Change of Reign
Rate of Distance Change of Power
Velocity of Power
Rate of Velocity of Energy
Acceleration of Energy
Velocity of Velocity of Force
Distance Change of Acceleration of Force
Velocity of Acceleration of Momentum
Reign of Distance Change
Distance Change of Rate of Power
Distance Change of Power of Rate
Rate of Power of Distance Change
Power of Distance Change of Rate
Power of Rate of Distance Change
Power of Velocity
Velocity of Rate of Energy
Velocity of Energy of Rate
Rate of Energy of Velocity
Energy of Rate of Velocity
Energy of Velocity of Rate
Energy of Acceleration
Velocity of Force of Velocity
Force of Velocity of Velocity
Distance Change of Force of Acceleration
Acceleration of Distance Change of Force
Acceleration of Force of Distance Change
Force of Distance Change of Acceleration
Force of Acceleration of Distance Change
Velocity of Momentum of Acceleration
Acceleration of Velocity of Momentum
Acceleration of Momentum of Velocity
Momentum of Velocity of Acceleration
Momentum of Acceleration of Velocity

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

Dynamics Definitions: Thrust

Mass = (M)
Distance Change = (DC)
Rate = (R) = (1 / Time Change)

Velocity = (1)(DC)(R)
Acceleration = (1)(DC)(R)^2
Momentum = (M)(DC)(R)
Force = (M)(DC)(R)^2
Energy = (M)(DC)^2(R)^2
Power = (M)(DC)^2(R)^3
Reign = (M)(DC)^2(R)^4
Drive = (M)(DC)^3(R)^4
Thrust = (M)(DC)^3(R)^5

Thrust is:

Rate of Drive
Rate of Distance Change of Reign
Velocity of Reign
Rate of Velocity of Power
Acceleration of Power
Rate of Acceleration of Energy
Velocity of Acceleration of Force
Acceleration of Acceleration of Momentum
Drive of Rate
Distance Change of Reign of Rate
Rate of Reign of Distance Change
Distance Change of Rate of Reign
Reign of Rate of Distance Change
Reign of Distance Change of Rate
Reign of Velocity
Rate of Power of Velocity
Velocity of Rate of Power
Velocity of Power of Rate
Power of Rate of Velocity
Power of Velocity of Rate
Power of Acceleration
Rate of Energy of Acceleration
Acceleration of Rate of Energy
Acceleration of Energy of Rate
Energy of Rate of Acceleration
Energy of Acceleration of Rate
Velocity of Force of Acceleration
Acceleration of Velocity of Force
Acceleration of Force of Velocity
Force of Velocity of Acceleration
Force of Acceleration of Velocity
Acceleration of Momentum of Acceleration
Momentum of Acceleration of Acceleration

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

Dynamics Definitions: Surge

Mass = (M)
Distance Change = (DC)
Rate = (R) = (1 / Time Change)

Velocity = (1)(DC)(R)
Acceleration = (1)(DC)(R)^2
Momentum = (M)(DC)(R)
Force = (M)(DC)(R)^2
Energy = (M)(DC)^2(R)^2
Power = (M)(DC)^2(R)^3
Reign = (M)(DC)^2(R)^4
Drive = (M)(DC)^3(R)^4
Thrust = (M)(DC)^3(R)^5
Surge = (M)(DC)^3(R)^6

Surge is:

Rate of Thrust
Rate of Rate of Drive
Rate of Velocity of Reign
Acceleration of Reign
Rate of Acceleration of Power
Acceleration of Acceleration of Force
Thrust of Rate
Rate of Drive of Rate
Drive of Rate of Rate
Rate of Reign of Velocity
Reign of Rate of Velocity
Reign of Velocity of Rate
Velocity of Rate of Reign
Velocity of Reign of Rate
Reign of Acceleration
Rate of Power of Acceleration
Power of Rate of Acceleration
Power of Acceleration of Rate
Acceleration of Rate of Power
Acceleration of Power of Rate
Acceleration of Force of Acceleration
Force of Acceleration of Acceleration

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

New Proposal for Lightspeed Definition

I have been grappling, in this blog, with defining the similar concepts: Velocity, Lightspeed, Momentum and Inertia.  One of my priorities right now is to bring order to these by establishing strict definitions.  The following is my latest proposal for Lightspeed:

Lightspeed is one light unit's distance change with no direction change per time change

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

of is multiplied by

of is multiplied by

This strict definition applies to English writing, as well as to science and mathematics.

In Metachemics, I have been trying to be conscientious about limiting my use of...(note the error!)

...about limiting my using "of" when it does not substitute for "multiplied by".  However, it can be difficult mostly because English writing does not always accommodate that strict definition.

Tonight, I went through my blog and looked for "of" errors to correct.  The following are some important ones:


Time Change was the synchronized progression of universal events

Time Change is synchronized universal events progression


The Universal Law was that the laws of physics are the same everywhere in The Universe

The Universal Law is that physics laws are the same everywhere in The Universe


Electricity was (2)(Mass)
{where Mass is a natural number and every two light units combine into the form of one electron}

Electricity is (2)(Mass)
{where Mass is a natural number and every two light units combine as one electron}


In some instances, "of" in Metachemics is appropriate.  These cases are always where "of" translates to "multiplied by".  For example, in my blog: "One Light Motion Defined", the final equation multiplies the terms: The Square Root Rate and Lightspeed

Finally, despite what I am advocating here--that being a mathematical rule expansion into English, I still intend to sign my science blogs, "Father of Metachemics".  I have no children--so if I am a "Father" multiplied by "Metachemics", this blog can be seen as my baby.

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

Expanding from my most recent premise

If my hypothesis in the last blog is correct:

One Electron is Two Light

And, if Electricity can be defined as Electron Quantity

Then, Electricity = (2)(Mass)
{where Mass is a natural number and every two light units combine as one electron}

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

How much Light is an Electron?

As I proved in the first month of writing in this blog:  All Matter is Light.

Physics has a bit of a dichotomy between Mechanics and E&M (Electricity and Magnetism).  Tonight, while I was trying to work out the notations for several E&M concepts, I realized that it is going to be really hard to do, unless someone first defines the concept "Electron".

For decades, I have held a hypothesis that perhaps:  "One Electron is Two Light".

Modern physicists claim both are "point-like", which could mean they are close in size.  If two Particles of the naturally gravitating Light units are stuck together, it could account for the Electron's natural spin.

But, despite my arguments, I really don't know.  Any help would be appreciated!

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

Energy, Volume, Pressure, and Sound

Energy = (M)(DC)^2(R)^2

Line = (DC)
Area = (DC)^2
Volume = (DC)^3

Pressure = (M)(R)^2 / (DC)

Question: Is Sound Volume of Pressure?

Increasing Volume increases Sound
If increasing Pressure increases Sound,
then, Sound = Volume of Pressure

If Sound = (M)(DC)^2(R)^2
then, Sound is Energy

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

Rate Definition and Use

Rate is One per Time Change

Since Time Change is present in physics concept denominators so frequently, and completing the equations looks a little confusing when one extends that fundamental concept at length in the denominator, I am going to create a new symbol that will be used quite a lot.  The following presents some examples:

Mass = (M)
Distance Change = (DC)
Rate = (R)

Velocity = (1)(DC)(R)
Acceleration = (1)(DC)(R)^2
Momentum = (M)(DC)(R)
Force = (M)(DC)(R)^2
Energy = (M)(DC)^2(R)^2
Power = (M)(DC)^2(R)^3
Reign = (M)(DC)^2(R)^4
Drive = (M)(DC)^3(R)^4
Thrust = (M)(DC)^3(R)^5
Surge = (M)(DC)^3(R)^6

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

The Next Big Project

The next big project in my Metachemics is to define all concepts used in physics in terms of: (Mass), (Distance Change), and (Time Change), according to where they are appropriate.

I have had this goal for over ten years, but did not think that I was ready until I recently created my formal relationship of Concepts to Notation.

This project may take me a very long time; and I will likely make more than a few mistakes, at first.  For all of you who are invested in Tech companies, I invite you to join in the effort and maybe even beat me to its conclusion.

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

Value Defined

Value is a Concept's Number

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

The Relationship Between Concepts and Notation

If Concept A has Notation B

and, Concept C has Notation B

then, Concept A is Concept C

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

Notation Defined

Notation is a necessary footnote that denotes measurement identity

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics

The Metachemical Method

Every thing is something.  The way many modern scientists go about using science concepts is with a lack of knowing what precisely they are talking about.  If a scientist is going to use a word, one should know its definition, and what's more, how it relates to the entire corpus of all other science.

Metachemics uses the following method in analyzing new science propositions to attempt to comply with the above demands:

(1) Is it something?

And, if so...

(2) What is it?

To cross-apply my method to the philosophy of Objectivism, the two step process for identifying the nature of existing entities can be expressed as:

(1) Existence?

(2) Identity?

Paul Wharton
Father of Metachemics